Thursday, May 14, 2026

Afghan family with eight children refuses to move into villa – heated dispute with the COA

On Tuesday, an extraordinary trial took place at the Almelo District Court, attracting attention not only from a legal but also from a social perspective.

The focus was on the  Centraal Orgaan opvang asielzoekers (COA)  – the Dutch agency for the accommodation of asylum seekers – and an Afghan family with eight minor children who currently live in an asylum seeker center in Almelo.

Background of the case

The family, consisting of a father, mother, and eight children, received a  temporary residence permit in the summer of the previous year . This gave them the right to move out of the asylum center and into regular accommodation.

In August 2022, a so-called  "huisvestingsgesprek  " (housing discussion) took place between the family and the COA. It was made clear that every recognized family receives  a one-time  housing offer, which they are obligated to accept. According to the COA, the family did not express any criteria or special requests at that time.

Continued on the next page ðŸ‘‡

The housing offer

In November 2022, the COA offered the family spacious accommodation in the municipality of Tholen. The authority emphasized that this house met all requirements – in terms of size, location, and standard.

However, in early February 2023, it became clear that the family had rejected the offer. Several discussions followed, in which the COA stated that the refusal was unfounded. Since the family continued to remain in the asylum center, the authorities initiated  eviction proceedings  – a first for the COA.

Continued on the next page ðŸ‘‡

The reason for the refusal

In court, the family emphasized that their concern  was not about the house itself  . Rather, the medical care of one of their children played a central role: The child is being treated at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam for a cleft lip and palate (schisis).

The family argued that the distance between Tholen and Rotterdam was too great to allow them to attend regular treatments without stress. The COA disagreed, pointing out that the apartment was within 50 kilometers of the hospital as the crow flies – precisely the maximum distance the authority considers acceptable.

Communication problems and concerns

The family's lawyer pointed out that the entire situation   was exacerbated by communication barriers . The father is illiterate and speaks neither Dutch nor English. As a result, much of the information received by the family was unclear or misleading.

What makes this particularly dramatic is that the court could grant the eviction order. In that case, the family with eight minor children would  literally be on the street . It is also unclear whether the family can stay together or whether they face separation if the COA offers alternative accommodation.

Continued on the next page ðŸ‘‡

A case with far-reaching implications

For the COA, this is an  unprecedented case . The authority has never before filed an eviction lawsuit against a recognized refugee family in the Netherlands. Consequently, the case is receiving considerable attention – both in the media and in society.

This case raises fundamental questions:

  • How far  must recognized refugee families comply with the requirements of the authorities?

  • What role  do medical and family circumstances play in the allocation of housing?

  • And:  How can we ensure that people who are linguistically or educationally disadvantaged truly understand their rights and obligations?

Continued on the next page ðŸ‘‡

 

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

×

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get exclusive tips and updates directly in your inbox.